Oboist Ray Still
A Conversation with Bruce Duffie
Ray Still (March 12, 1920 - March 12, 2014), was the first oboist
of the Chicago Symphony for forty years. He enjoyed a long and
distinguished career in orchestral, solo, and chamber music. He played
under almost all the major conductors of the last half of the 20th century,
and recorded much of the repertoire for oboe solo and ensemble. The
many students he taught in graduate and undergraduate programs and international
clinics and master classes now staff symphonies and universities around
the world.
After his retirement, he toured in Europe, Ireland, Canada, and Japan
and taught at Northwestern University, and the University of Maryland.
His distinctive tone and musical style have influenced and inspired
musicians throughout the world. Naturally, being brought up in
Evanston (home of Northwestern University), I had become used to the fact
that the Chicago Symphony was at the top of the orchestral world, and
that included the sound Still produced in performance and on records.
While I was with WNIB Classical 97 as Announcer/Producer, I hosted
a long series of programs which included interviews with the composer
and/or the featured performers. Having studied bassoon and contrabassoon
with Wilbur Simpson,
who played Second Bassoon in the CSO for forty-five years, he, as well as
several other CSO musicians graciously allowed me to chat with them for
these broadcasts. Names which are links on this page refer to transcripts
of my interviews which are posted on this website.
In May of 1994, Still had recently retired from the Symphony, and he
invited me to his home to do the interview . . . . .
Bruce Duffie: Thank you very much for inviting
me to this lovely environment!
Ray Still: Thank you for coming. You
should see our garden. It’s really gorgeous out in the back yard.
We will go out and see it later. It’s my wife’s pride and joy.
She loves gardening.
BD: Does she like oboe playing?
Still: Yes, she likes oboe playing, but
she gets a little sick of it sometimes. I’m on a big practicing
kick right now — long hours
every day getting ready to make some new recordings. So, it gets
a little monotonous. She was asking me if I wanted to go to our
daughter’s place in Springfield, Ohio, for the weekend for Mother’s
Day, and I said, “No, I’m on a roll right now.” Then she came into
the studio and saw me with the Knicks & Nets [basketball] game on.
Luckily, I was also putting my hi-fi together, because the Nets &
Knicks in the next room were in the background.
BD: [With mock disgust] Are you not
a Bulls fan???
Still: [Laughs] I’m a Nets fan right
now because I want them to beat the Knicks. I want all the top
contenders to be knocked off so that the Bulls have a chance! [Much
laughter]
BD: Without Jordan it’s a little harder
for them. [This was when Michael Jordan was playing baseball,
between stints with the Bulls.]
Still: Yes, they’re having a tough time
of it.
BD: They just beat somebody three in a row...
Still: Yes, but it was the Cleveland Cavaliers
without three of their best players.
BD: Well, it’s Chicago without their best
player, so it evens out a little bit.
Still: Yes. They’ve still got Pippen,
and Grant, and Armstrong, so they’ve got three damn good players.
It’s just that they don’t have their Superman! [More laughter]
Did you notice in the paper that they’re putting a Jordan-Watch
on every day? They say what he did each day in baseball.
Every day they show just his eyes, and note that he struck out twice.
BD: Yesterday he got a hit, and a bloop
single.
Still: Yes, something like that. It’s
so silly! Here’s a guy down in a Double-A minor league
— which is third-class
— and they’re riding around in a first-class
bus that he bought them for $350,000! Those guys don’t want him
to be promoted.
BD: [Re-assuringly] Oh, they’ll get
to keep the bus.
Still: Yes, maybe. [Laughter continues]
BD: That was a classy thing to do, rather
than have the team be in an ordinary bus, while he was riding in his
Porsche.
Still: Oh, sure, sure!
BD: There seems to be a connection between
music and sports. A lot of the composers follow baseball, and
a lot of other musicians follow baseball and basketball. Is there
a special connection with all this?
Still: I don’t know that there is.
The guys in the Symphony used to talk sports, but that was probably
the same percentage of sports fanatics that there are as there in the
average population. A lot of the guys would not be interested at
all.
BD: It would be the same as if you went
into any ordinary business office?
Still: Yes, probably. Some of us were
fanatics. The year the Cubs were winning there was a piece in
the paper about my having a radio on stage at Ravinia. It was funny,
because the conductor was Kurt Masur. He
was from an East German orchestra, and at that time it was Communist, where
they could have all the time they want. They didn’t dare protest
about overtime, or playing long hours, so he had all the time he wanted
in the world. But at Ravinia you have to be very thrifty with your
time. He was doing the Beethoven Ninth, and the Choral
Fantasy, and he just was wasting a lot of time, and all the guys were
asking me, “What the hell are the Cubs doing?” This was the
game that could make or lose the season, so I had this radio in my briefcase,
and a little earphone in my ear. I wasn’t supposed to be playing.
I was just supposed to be sitting there watching him explain bowings to the
fiddles, and the guys on either side of me were saying, “What’s the score?”
and I’d say, “Still the same thing!” I didn’t notice Masur him coming
up to me. Suddenly, he was standing right over my music stand, and
he said, “Is that a radio you’re listening to?” I said, “Oh, no, Maestro!
I was just checking the pitch!” [Gales of laughter]
BD: A constant 440 in your ear!
Still: Yes! Anyway, that made the
newspaper. In some ways, we’re pretty fanatical sports fans.
I’ve never done this, but some guys sitting in the back in brass or
percussion, have come with little portable TVs to use when they’re not
playing for a movement. [Continuous laughter throughout all of
this story]
BD: There are occasionally pictures of guys
who play in pit orchestras that have a crossword puzzle on their stand.
Still: Oh, they do. Dale Clevenger, the
horn player, was constantly doing crossword puzzles on the stage.
He had his nose in it all the time...
BD: ...but he never missed an entrance!
Still: Ah... I wouldn’t say that!
If his assistant nudges him in time, he doesn’t miss an entrance!
BD: There are sports fanatics everywhere.
Is it good that there are Symphony fanatics?
Still: Oh, yes! We appreciate
the fact that there are Symphony fanatics and Symphony groupies, and
people that follow the Symphony very closely. Those are our public,
and we know that it’s a much smaller public than the sports audience.
BD: Would you want your audience to be as
big as the sports public?
Still: I don’t know. I don’t
think the audience for great art — the
kind of art in great museums, or the great poetry, or Shakespearian
plays, or serious drama of any kind, or chamber music, or symphonic music
— is ever going to be as large as the
popular things. It’s never going to be as great as an audience for
the rock groups, and the popular groups, and so forth, but that’s the way
it is. The majority probably are people who will never dig below
the surface in any field. They never really put out the effort to
become fanatics.
BD: Is this one of the things that we should
let people know — that classical
music can be enjoyed superficially as well as in great depth?
Still: Sure. I once made an album with
Robert Russell Bennett called Classical Music For People Who Don’t
Know Anything About Classical Music! It was just a bunch of
favorite easy, catchy tunes that anybody could like immediately.
There was a little bit from ‘Morning’ of the Peer Gynt Suite, and
the opening theme from Brahms’s Haydn Variations...
BD: Just the big hits?
Still: Yes, the hits. Anybody could
listen to those and say, “I don’t think classical music is so bad.
I can hear some tunes, and even that’s not bad.” [This LP,
with its very interesting visual design, is shown at the bottom of this
webpage.] You can draw people in with Beethoven’s Greatest
Hits, or Bach’s Greatest Hits. Real music-lovers look
down on that sort of thing, but if they drag anybody in, fine!
Even the picture Amadeus — which
I despise, personally. I didn’t
despise every part of it. I liked that one little speech that Salieri
made, where he talked about Mozart’s Gran Partita, and this simple
little bit he put into third movement with the horns, and then this little
syncopated beat comes in. Salieri says that’s all very ordinary,
but then, in the fourth bar, suddenly comes this oboe from heaven!
[Both laugh] I didn’t mind that part! It is a heavenly oboe
part. It’s a part that once you play it, you never forget it, and
once you hear it played really well, you never forget the theme. Salieri
was just dumbfounded by the genius of introducing the theme in that way,
so that’s the part I didn’t mind. However, I just hated the distortion
at the end. It is not facts, it’s fantasy.
BD: But at least now we don’t have to explain
who Amadeus is. Most people now know Mozart, at least a little
bit.
Still: Right.
BD: Is it your responsibility, as an oboe
player, to make sure that any phrase is indeed heavenly?
Still: It depends on your own taste, as an
oboe player, what you think is heavenly. What some oboe players
think is heavenly might include an extremely wobbly heavy vibrato, but
then another oboe player might have a very thin kind of a shaky tone, and
both might say that they are imitating a singer. In fact, all instrumentalists
without exception say, “I’m imitating a singer when I play my instrument.”
BD: Do you encourage this idea when you’re
teaching, to have a singing tone?
Still: Of course, but it all depends.
I encourage my oboe players not to listen to the oboe very much, but
to listen to singers, or violinists, or cellists much more than the
oboe.
BD: Specific singers or just singers?
Still: Very specific singers. I say
not to listen to ordinary singers. Don’t listen to Beverly Sills
in her declining days, where she vibrated a major third on either side
of the pitch. Do listen to anything that Fritz Wunderlich recorded.
Listen to him for a singing tone. Listen to Elly Ameling, who has
one of the truest pitches of any singer that ever lived. She just
has a flawless pitch, and a flawless center to her tone. Also, Fischer-Dieskau,
and Jorma Hynninen, the Finish bass, who has infallible pitch and
a beautiful, beautiful vibrato. I also encourage them to hear Christa
Ludwig in her prime. I often play for them a record that we made
with Reiner of the Soliloquy and the Recognition Scene from Elektra
with Inge Borkh. Nobody could sing any greater than that.
I heard another record of Elektra recently, and it turned out to
be Birgit Nilsson
with the Vienna Philharmonic and Solti conducting. That was pretty
great too, but Inge Borkh just happened to be with us at that time,
and I don’t think we ever made it any more exciting a record than that.
Two scenes from Elektra, and the final scene from Salome.
It was incredible.
To close the Orchestra’s sixty-fifth season, music director Fritz
Reiner chose Strauss’s Elektra. “This was a monumental performance
superbly cast, and scaled to the full grandeur of Inge Borkh’s magnificent
singing in the title role,” wrote Claudia Cassidy in the Chicago
Tribune. “I for one have heard nothing like the outpouring
of that amazing voice since the days of Kirsten Flagstad. . . . This
is a huge soprano, glistening in timbre, most beautiful when it mounts
the high tessitura and welcomes the merciless orchestra of the still fabulous
Strauss. She can ride the whirlwinds, or she can touch, surprisingly,
the heart.”
Borkh committed excerpts from Strauss’s Elektra and
Salome to disc shortly after her performances. With
Reiner and the Orchestra, she recorded Salome on December 10,
1955, and Elektra on April 16, 1956, both in Orchestra Hall.
== From the CSO Archives
Later CD re-issues of this material in "Living Stereo" would also
include Reiner's Dance of the Seven Veils.
On a related note, Solti would conduct Borkh in her U.S.
opera debut as Elektra in San Francisco in September of 1953, and as
Salome at Lyric Opera of Chicago in October of 1956. She was also Sieglinde
in Die Walküre with Solti in both theaters in those same
seasons.
|
|
[Still continues] I’m so fortunate that I was in the orchestra
for those two great eras — Reiner’s
and Solti’s. The rest I could gladly skip, but...
BD: Even when the conducting was perhaps
not as great, you didn’t feel that your playing
would help to raise the standard of the orchestra?
Still: It’s funny, because one of the complaints
that the French conductor, Martinon, made about me was that he felt
that I was sabotaging his concerts. ‘Sabotage’
is a French word. We pointed that out in the hearing that I
had afterwards, where I got my job back. He didn’t understand
that no musician worth his salt could ever do less than his best.
It’s like the short story of the knife thrower. The guy was a knife
thrower, and his wife was the one that he’d outlined with the knives
every night at the circus. He found out that she was cheating
on him, and he was dying to just make a mistake on purpose, and put a
knife right through her heart. But his art was at stake.
She’d stand there laughing at him, because she knew he was the victim
of doing his best all the time. He couldn’t just throw the knives
badly on purpose.
BD: That was her life insurance policy?
Still: Yes. Any good musician can’t
purposely play badly. There’s just too much of a reflection on
your art. You can’t do it in order, as he said, to try to sabotage
the conductor’s concert. You would sabotage your own career.
They don’t hear the notes coming out of the baton, they hear them coming
out of you. So, that was a particularly dismal era for me, but
then Solti came in and made everything right. Solti was a real Mensch,
like Reiner was, too. I was going to leave about the same time that
Solti did, but it was thirty-seven years, and I thought I’d stick around
three more years and make it forty, a nice round number. But I
really probably should have left at thirty-seven years. It was the
end of a magical era, and things didn’t seem the same after Solti left.
BD: [At the time of this interview in May
of 1994, the new Principal Oboe had not yet been selected. Alex Klein would win the
position in 1995.] They’re still working on trying to fill
your position. Is there any correlation between trying to fill
this position in the Symphony, and the Bulls trying to fill the position
now that Michael Jordan has left?
Still: That’s a very flattering comparison.
I would certainly love to be called the Michael Jordan of the oboe.
In fact, somebody sent in a very humorous piece from a suburban
newspaper. It was written as a satirical thing, supposedly about
the year 2001. Michael Jordan had just finished ten years of a successful
baseball career, and gotten three World Series rings, so he’s decided
to become a symphonic oboe player. [Much laughter] The guy
that wrote it was very, very clever, and said he’s having truck-loads of
cane for reeds delivered to his house, in anticipation of going into the
Symphony. After all, he’s only 41, so there’s no reason why he couldn’t
become a great symphonic oboe player. It was a great article.
* * *
* *
BD: Is it satisfying to be Principal Oboe
in the Symphony, and still have a solo career? Also, how did you
balance those two?
Still: When Solti first came to the Chicago
Symphony, I was really aching to go more into a solo career. That
was, after all, twenty-five years ago. I was fifty years old,
and I’d figured I’d had quite a lot of symphonic oboe playing. I
told him I was thinking of leaving because I wanted to make a lot of
solo recordings, and he was very upset. He said, “My dear, you should
not worry about that because I’m sure we can make some solo recordings
here with you.” A couple of years later I said, “Do you remember
the bit about the solo recordings?” He said, “I didn’t realize
that it’s such an expensive proposition to record with this orchestra.
When you record with the Chicago Symphony, you have to pay the whole
orchestra. So, if you do a Mozart concerto,”
— which I was very interested in doing at that
time — “you have to pay the whole
orchestra!” The whole orchestra means 110 people, even though
you’re only using twenty-five of them. That’s one of the reasons
we don’t record much small stuff. It wasn’t until I was about 65
years old that Claudio
Abbado decided to record four concertos with first chair men
— Adolph Herseth, Willard Elliot, Dale
Clavenger, and myself, on Deutsche Grammaphon. That was the first
and only solo recording I ever made with the Chicago Symphony.
Of course, and made a lot of orchestral recordings with big incidental solos,
but my name was never on them as a solo player. The next year
after that, I made a solo recording in London, in which I did the Strauss
Concerto, and the J.S. Bach Oboe d’Amore concerto. All
this was after I was 65 years old. In fact, I think I’m the only
oboe player that ever played the Strauss concerto live in person after
70! [Laughs] I did that with Klaus Tennstedt four years
ago. Actually, in a way, I’m glad that I didn’t do my solo recordings
earlier. I did some chamber music recordings, like the one with Itzhak
Perlman, and another with Pinchas Zukerman and Lynn Harrell, plus the
oboe quartet records.
BD: Wasn’t there one
with the Fine Arts Quartet?
Still: Yes, that was about thirty-eight
years ago, when I first came here. Then I did the Bach Double
with Itzhak in Israel, and a few other things, but generally I haven’t
made a great number of solo recordings. But I recorded the things
that I really wanted to record the most, the best pieces of music. The
two best oboe concertos by far are the Strauss, and the Mozart. The
others are way behind those, so I’m glad that I waited until I was mature.
By that time, I had done those pieces many times with the Chicago
Symphony. In fact, I did the Strauss Concerto every ten years
with the Symphony — with Reiner,
with Martinon, with Solti, and finally with Tennstedt, all ten years
apart over a forty-year-period. So, by the time I finally recorded
it, I really knew what I wanted to do with it, because I had heard all
the radio tapes. We had discussed it so many times, and hated
the results, so when I finally got a chance to record it, I knew what
I wanted to do. Incidentally, the reason we were able to do the Mozart
with Abbado was because we put it on the tail end of another recording
session by Schlomo Mintz. His Prokofiev gave us a half-hour to record
the Mozart, after four hours of recording with him.
BD: An Anhang [appendix]!
Still: Yes, right! [Much laughter]
BD: Are you pleased with these solo recordings
now that do exist?
Still: Oh, yeah! I’m very pleased with
the Mozart. It is probably the best thing I’ve ever done, and
one of the best things about it was that it was basically made in thirty-five
minutes. From the take that we did the first day, we threw it all
out except the first page, because I didn’t like the reed that I had.
It just wasn’t satisfactory, and I didn’t even hear the results
because the recording director was sick, and he just didn’t want to play
anything for me. The following day, Abbado forgot to come upstairs.
I was supposed to have forty-minutes, so we had just thirty-five
minutes. This was just enough time to go through it once, and in
fact we started with the second movement. Then we did the third movement
with no stops. We had five minutes left, and I said, “Quick, let’s
go to the first movement, and take the second page.” We just had
barely enough time to go from that second page to the cadenza
— which I had pre-recorded
— so basically the whole thing is like direct-to-disc!
I’m very, very happy with it. I think it’s one of my best. The
Strauss, on the other hand, took six hours to record.
BD: When you make a record, which is presumably
technically perfect, do you set up an impossible standard for yourself
and for others?
Still: [Thinks a moment] I don’t think
so, because there’ll be plenty of other oboe players. Even though
I’m pleased with it, there’ll be plenty of other oboe players of other
‘schools’ of oboe playing. They will pick holes in it and say,
“Oh, my God! Did you hear the way he played that appoggiatura?”
or “Listen how sharp that high D was!” You can take anybody’s recording,
and pick it apart. But just in general, I like it. It represents
the best of my playing. It’s the kind of thing that I want people
to hear if it is still around and can be heard fifty or a hundred years
from today.
BD: It’s in
plastic. Do you not feel that it will be around in a hundred years
from now???
Still: I don’t know. You can’t tell
how those things are going to hold up.
BD: Well, is there such a thing as a musical
perfection?
Still: There is, but sometimes it’s very boring.
I made a record of the Bach big G Minor Sonata for the Swedish
Radio with my son, Tom, which is almost as near as I would probably ever
come to perfection. But even there, I can always hear those little
imperfections in it. However, I would say this one is not boring.
This is probably the best record that I’ve ever made, but none of my
records that I’ve made are ever perfect. There’s always something
that I’m taking a chance with to make it better musically, and if you
are taking a chance, you’re bound to have some little flaws, and I don’t
mind those flaws.
BD: It’s good to have little flaws and a
big sweep?
Still: Yes. It’s not necessary to
have the flaws, and these days with these splicing techniques that
are used, you can hear absolutely apparently flawless records. But
you and I know that those would not really be so flawless if they were
live performances.
BD: Then at what point does this cut-and-splice
become a fraud?
Still: As Herseth said to me many times, the
whole recording business is a swindle. In a way it’s a swindle
if it’s infinitely spliced, but it’s still an art to be able to play well
enough so that you can splice the takes together, or take the best of the
takes, and make it sound continuous as though it’s perfect.
BD: [Gently protesting] But that’s
an engineering art.
Still: Yes, but it’s partly the artist, too,
because people with a lot of experience in recording know how to build
the continuity in there. They know how to keep the same feeling,
even when they’re interrupted several times. When I was rehearsing
with Itzhak Perlman and Pinchas Zukerman and Lynn Harrell in Itzhak’s
apartment in New York, they were always pulling jokes on each other. Itzhak
said, “Pinkie, come here. I want you to hear something.” So,
he took him into the other room, and he played for him the tape of a new
recording that was about to be issued. It was a Sinding piece that
was made famous by Heifetz, and it was just incredible. It was so
spectacular. It just took your breath away. It was absolutely
flawless. Itzhak said, “How do you like it?” and Zukerman said,
“It’s fantastic. I bet you wish you could play like that!”
[Much laughter] Actually, Itzhak can play with that perfection
on occasion, but even with Heifetz, who was known for perfection, you can
hear lots of places in his records where he’s a little out of tune.
BD: He was supposed to be a machine.
Still: Yes, he was a machine. He was
pretty damn perfect, but even so, he was exciting. I haven’t said
he was boring in his perfection.
* * *
* *
BD: Has the standard of playing
— either violin or oboe
— risen over the last forty years?
Still: Oh, very much so. In the movie Fantasia,
I was the stand-in for Marcel Tabuteau. I was seventeen years old,
and I was the stand-in for him on the set as Fantasia was being
photographed. My silhouette was being photographed, but not my
sound. It was Tabuteau’s recorded sound. He was the famous
oboe player who has taught so many oboe players in the United States.
Now, if you listen to his playing in that movie, and if you listen to any
of his other records that he made at that time, there are many students
around today who can play much better than that. Any number of professional
players can play better than he played, but he was a pioneer in developing
a new way of playing, and developing a new kind of sound on the oboe. It
was a new approach.
BD: This is about technical perfection,
and being able to play the notes. Has the musical ability and
musical concentration also gotten better over forty years?
Still: [Thinks a moment] Yes, but the percentage
is about the same of people who are good, journeyman players that you’d
listen to in an audience, and you’d say, “Well, they are good.
That’s a good flute player, or that’s good bassoon playing,” as opposed
to someone whom you listen to and say, “Oh, my God, this is a great music
lesson. Listen to this guy or girl play! It’s just miraculous.
It’s pure musical inspiration coming out of that instrument.”
Now when you can say that, you can also say it has a musical personality
with it. One can talk about how you shouldn’t individualize the
music too much, but the very process of playing is subjective. You
react to the music in your own particular way, and then you play it the
way you feel it, governed, to a certain extent, by the conductor.
If the conductor doesn’t like it, he can always say, “We want it a little
less Schmaltzy there.” In the very seductive solo in the last
part of Afternoon of a Faun, I started to play it and Reiner stopped
me. He said, “Ray, you don’t play with enough color at this point.
I heard Tabuteau play this solo, and he played it...”
I don’t remember whether he said ‘so sexy’
or ‘so voluptuously’.
I hadn’t heard Tabuteau play it, but I took up the challenge, and played
it with more Schmaltz. I don’t know whether that satisfied
him or not, but you sometimes err on the side of not putting enough personality
into it for certain kinds of music, and then at other times, the conductor
will ask for more. I asked Reiner at that time if I had to go with
a glissando downward, and he said, “No!!!”
BD: This is one of the big complaints that
we hear about pianists these days, that they’re all sounding alike, and
they lack individuality.
Still: Yes, that’s true.
BD: With your students, do you try to encourage
their individuality?
Still: Not individuality just to be different.
I encourage them to listen to an awful lot of music, and then follow
their musical instincts, especially, as I said before, not listening
so much to oboe players, but to listen to other instruments. If
you listen to oboe players, you’re listening to the limitations of an
oboe. But if you listen to a really great singer, or a great pianist,
or a great violinist, or a great cellist, you’re hearing the best musical
results by some of the top artists of the world, not just oboe players.
So, I encourage them to go for it. You’re going to be influenced
by your teacher to a certain extent, but I always say that I’m trying not
to tell them how to play the oboe. I’m trying to free them up physically,
and to improve their efficiency in the way they use their body, so that
they can play any way they want. They can play any style, with any
kind of vibrato, any get the sound that they want. That’s my job
is as an ‘oboe doctor’, or an ‘oboe analyst’
— to analyze what is wrong with the way they’re doing it
physically. So many of them end up with so much tension in their bodies
that they end up doing most of the work against their own glottis.
[Demonstrates a tight, gripped throat] You hear even when they talk.
BD: That’s not just the result of the small
bit of breath that has to go into the oboe?
Still: No. When playing the oboe,
you have to fool yourself into thinking that it takes more than a tuba
takes. You actually psyche yourself into believing that you’re
blowing more air through the oboe than you would have to on a low note
of a tuba. By doing that, you keep the blowing muscles free, and
then when all that breath encounters the reed, it sets up a natural
pressure behind the reed. Then your ear tells you exactly how
much to use, and not 1,000th of an ounce more of pressure, or not 1,000th
of a erg more energy.
BD: Have you consulted with Arnold Jacobs
[Principal Tuba with the Chicago Symphony 1944-88] about this?
Still: Oh yes! Jacobs has been my
principal teacher for years.
BD: For breath support?
Still: Or just general use of the body efficiently.
I’ve always said that I really studied with Jacobs, because I
would pick his brain at every opportunity. We actually made some
tests when we were both playing in a band out in Colorado together. He
did some tests, and he checked the way I was using my breath, and found
out that I was using it wrong. He said he talked to some of my students,
and was disturbed by the fact that I was telling them things that he
thought were exactly the opposite of the way they should be done. I
was kind of shocked by that, but then I started talking to him, and I
realized he was right! So, every time I got into any kind of difficulty
through the years, I’d go to Arnold, and he’d get me straightened out.
BD: It’s a great
tribute to a great colleague.
Still: Oh, yes, he’s very unselfish that
way, but I don’t just pass it on. I’m constantly experimenting
on myself, and on my students with the information to prove that it
works. I use myself as a guinea pig, and I use my students as guinea
pigs. Students who come to me might be fairly advanced in their
technical way of playing the oboe, but their tones are very constricted
and very shallow, because they’re blowing backwards.
They’re blowing by locking the muscles down here below the ribs. These
are the muscles which are for the expelling the air, and they’re the
most efficient at emptying your lungs in the quickest way. So, these
students lock those muscles so that they are immobilized. The fact
is that the oboe takes such an incredibly tiny amount of air, they’re able
to play the oboe just by compressing their chests, You might say
it’s like trying to get the toothpaste out of the tube in one swoop, but
only squeezing it at the top. You have to start from the bottom
to get a continuous flow. Oboe players sometimes take a little time
to develop the maturity of sound, the bigness of sound, like singers do.
Singers reach a certain age of maturity when their sound is at its best,
and oboe players tend to do that, too.
BD: Then does it level off, or is there
a decline, and can you maintain it?
Still: It all depends. Like singers,
there are stories of some tenors who sang beautifully until they were
seventy-five years old, and still had very clear voices. Then you
have people who sang beautifully, and suddenly stop at about forty. Many
singers seem to hit their peaks around forty-five or fifty, and then start
declining. The strange thing is that in Europe, everybody was always
so amazed that I was still playing the oboe in the Chicago Symphony at
the age of seventy-three, or seventy-four. Over there, there’s
a stipulation that they retire from the First Chair when they’re sixty.
BD: Can they stay in the section, but stop
being Principal?
Still: Yes. In some places, they don’t
have that anymore. They can stay but they choose not to.
It’s too hard on brass players especially. They’re astounded that
Bud Herseth can still play all the high trumpet parts, and he’s just six
months younger than I am. He’s also seventy-four. [Herseth
was Principal Trumpet in the CSO from 1948-2001, and continued in the section
until 2004.]
BD: The voice is a muscle that can deteriorate
with age. With the oboe, you have the embouchure that’s a muscle,
but it’s not actually what is producing so much of the sound.
It’s controlling the sound.
Still: It’s
controlling the sound, but the main thing that’s controlling the sound
is the breath, and that’s the main thing that’s controlling the voice
also. I heard Hans Hotter sing an incredible song recital in
Aspen. At a party afterwards, some woman asked him, “How do you
get that incredible control all through your upper range, and through
your lower range?” He said, “It’s the breath. Once you learn
the breath, that’s everything.” Now, that isn’t exactly true, any
more than somebody who would tell you that baseball is all pitching.
That’s an oversimplification. Somebody’s got to catch the ball,
and you have to have several other players out there besides the pitcher
and the catcher who are pretty damn good, because you can’t strike out
every batter. Then it would be a hundred per cent of the game.
But in brass or woodwind playing, the efficiency with which you use the
breath is such a huge part of it. Of course, in oboe playing the
reed is important, too. You have to have a pretty good reed, and
it takes an awful long time to develop the ability to make these reeds.
You’re really making the major part of your instrument every day.
BD: How long should a reed last?
Still: I had one amazing reed last summer that
I kept ‘babying’, and not playing on it for anything that was unimportant.
I played it for mostly the important solos, and it lasted me something
like five weeks. I was so happy with it. I played the big solos
in the Brahms Violin Concerto, which started the season, and Romeo
and Juliet of Berlioz, and the Shostakovich First. I
just saved it for those, and I didn’t play it in rehearsals at all.
[Laughs]
BD: Generally, though, how long do they last
— maybe a week?
Still: Probably a week. Maybe you
can coax two weeks out them, but you have to rotate them. If
you play six hours a day with really brutal treatment, you’re going
to have a wet dish rag on your hands. They just can’t take that
continuous blowing.
BD: Do you ever envy the flute players that
don’t have to tinker with reeds at all?
Still: Yes... but they envy us because we
have our excuses for playing badly. [Big burst of laughter]
* * *
* *
BD: Let me ask the big philosophical question.
What’s the purpose of music?
Still: Hmmm... You’re talking generally
for the world’s population?
BD: Yes. [Vis-à-vis
the photo on the record cover at right, the performers are Williard Elliot
(also the transcriber of the Grieg) at far right, immediately left of
him is Wilbur Simpson, and behind Wilbur is Ray Still. Others shown
(l-r) are Grover Schiltz, oboe, John Bruce Yeh, clarinet,
Norman Schweikert (top), horn, Larry Combs, clarinet,
and Daniel Gingrich, horn.]
Still: I don’t know. It seems to be
a necessity. People have always had music, even if it’s only been
rhythmic. They’ve had some kind of music since the beginning of
time. The oboe goes back to ancient Egypt, and maybe before that
as some sort of double-reed instrument. There’s some kind of a
need for music. Whether it’s for playing an instrument, or for
singing, there seems to be a basic psychological need for release of emotion
through musical sound. It all depends. There are so many different
kinds of music. I have a grandson who’s mostly interested in rock,
and the stuff that he’s interested in absolutely puzzles me that he can
listen to stuff that is monotonous and simplistic. My second love,
besides symphonic and chamber music and so forth, is jazz. I listen
to jazz quite a lot, to the point that my wife says, “Will you stop playing
that stuff and listen to something else. You’re beating a dead horse
by playing that stuff so much!” I play things mostly from the late
’30s through the early ’50s.
BD: Isn’t that when
it was the most complex?
Still: Not necessarily the most complex.
It got complex in the middle ’40s when Dizzy Gillespie
and Bird (Charlie Parker) were combining to start the Bop era.
It got pretty complicated with the chord structures of Lenny Tristano,
and a lot of the music of that period began to get quite complex harmonically.
I’m not over-enamored of the Bop school, and in its early form it didn’t
really last very well. I’m interested a lot in early recordings of
what I would call chamber music — the
small recordings of Billie Holiday, and Lester Young, with the all-star
groups that were behind them. I have three CDs that include all
the Columbia recordings that I listen to an awful lot, and I listen to
the 1928-1930 records of Louis Armstrong, and Ben Webster, and Coleman
Hawkins. I also listen to a lot of records of the Duke Ellington Band
and the Count Basie Band.
BD: Does all of this make you a better musician,
and in turn a better oboe player?
Still: It certainly has an effect on my playing,
and on my expressiveness on my instrument. For instance, I’ve developed
a philosophy which is, in some ways, influenced by Johnny Hodges, the
great alto player with the Duke Ellington Band for many years, and Lester
Young. Most jazz players are not worthy of their salt if they can’t
make a glissando between notes on the instrument like the human voice.
There have been so-called jazz oboe players, but they’re completely unable
to imitate the jazz glissando. I make it part of the training of
my students that the glissando is a must. They must be able to glissando.
BD: It that, maybe, why Reiner didn’t want
it, because he’d never heard it? Maybe he should have heard you
do it!
Still: [Laughs] No, he had heard me
do it. There’s a place in Rhapsodie Espagnole of Ravel
where there’s a little melody in the cellos [sings it with a glissando
semitone]. It’s a beautiful little glissando. It’s just a
half-tone glissando, and then the oboe has it later, and I would do the
same. Frank would always look over at me and laugh because an oboe
is not supposed to do that.
BD: On a string instrument it’s easy, but
on the oboe it’s very difficult?
Still: It’s just the ability to do it. Herseth
can do it on the trumpet very well, and Peck does it on the flute.
Most people can do it. [Reiner appointed Donald Peck as Assistant
Principal, then promoted him to Principal the following year. He
remained with the Orchestra until 1999.]
BD: Of course, the clarinet player has to do it
to open Rhapsody In Blue.
Still: Yes, they have tricky ways of doing
that. They do partly finger-glissando by half-holing the fingers
and gradually lifting them, but my God, if you’d listened to Barney Bigard
of the old Duke Ellington Band, it was such a supple instrument.
He glissandoed from anything to anything. It was just like a
voice. That’s one of the things which makes playing flexible, and
allows you to play more expressively, and make it more like a human voice.
A human voice doesn’t have any keys that you can press. With
the human voice, you have to make the notes, and it’s almost impossible
to go from one note to another in the voice without some sort of little
transition between them, unless you stop the tone, and make it staccato.
BD: I was always amazed at Birgit Nilsson when
she would sing Brünnhilde’s Ho-Yo-To-Ho
in Die Walküre. It sounded almost like a clarinet
hitting the register key for the octave skips. There was no glissando
there, nothing in between those notes. It wasn’t smeared, and it
wasn’t a slide.
Still: Right, but if you slowed it down
to about one-fourth the speed, you’d hear that she does it so cleverly
that it’s integrated. It’s totally smooth. String players
treat that as part of their expressiveness on their instruments.
I believe in that kind of flexibility.
* * *
* *
BD: I want to ask you now about new music.
Are there some new concertos being written for the oboe?
Still: Yes there are, but I don’t play them.
I leave that to the younger players. There are plenty of players
who don’t feel comfortable with Mozart, and don’t feel quite at home
with Bach and Strauss, so they become specialists at newer music.
BD: Would you advise someone who’s writing a work
for the oboe, to include these glissandos that we’re talking about?
Still: They do now. They have them
written in. I was showing a student how to do these half-tone
glissandos when they were written into the music just recently.
BD: Without mentioning specific names,
are there any concertos or solos being written today that will take
their place alongside the Strauss and the Mozart?
Still: I really wouldn’t know because
I’m not that interested. Don’t get me wrong... I am interested in
contemporary music. I heard a recital just two days ago with Easley Blackwood and
a very good violinist, Sharon Polifrone. She was excellent, and
they played one of Blackwood’s sonatas for violin and piano. They
also played an Ives sonata, a Beethoven sonata, and another piece at
the end. I actually enjoyed Easley’s piece more than the Beethoven
sonata. The Beethoven sonata was good, but maybe it was just the
fact that the Blackwood sonata was more unusual, or maybe it could have
had something to do with their playing in the Beethoven.
BD: Was the Blackwood a new work, or an
old work? He has recently come back to the tonal system.
Still: Yes he has, and he says that
this work is not the kind of work that he really is very much enamored
with these days, but he still doesn’t mind it being played. But today
he’s writing totally different music. The Fifth Symphony
that the Orchestra played is almost like Sibelius. Like
Somerset Maughan said once, “When ten new books come out, I read an
old one!” [Both laugh] I’ve enjoyed playing some of the contemporary
stuff, but I enjoy listening to it in the audience much more than playing
it. Some of the things I used to hate to play, because it made
you feel so stupid as a player. It didn’t require any of the techniques
that you studied so hard all your life to produce a beautiful sound.
It just said, “Play all these notes, and you can play any notes you want,
and just make some general sounds.” They didn’t show whether it was
ugly or pretty.
BD: [Indicating a bright idea] But
if it says to play any notes you want, you can select Telemann’s!
Still: Yes! In one piece maybe by
John Cage, he said, “You
can sit anywhere you want in the orchestra, and you can play any instrument
you want!” The music was in little frames, and didn’t have any
notes. It just told you whether to go up or down. [Laughing]
Imagine a fiddle player there trying to go up and down on a flute...
BD: We’re back to Michael Jordan again,
when he starts playing oboe after being a baseball player!
Still: Yes!
BD: Are you optimistic about the whole future
of music, and of oboe playing?
Still: Oh, sure! The way things are
happening now, there’s so many young virtuosos on the oboe that they’re
going to take it to much greater heights. There are going to
be ten skillful technicians, and ten very good oboe players for every
unusual oboe player — somebody
who has really something to say. They don’t often have that much
to say musically, any more than you’d say that of ten fiddle players that
you hear around today.
BD: Will many of these good technicians fill slots
in orchestras, and do very well for themselves?
Still: Oh yes! But the ones who will really
put the art ahead are those with a super-imagination. They will
carry the expressiveness of the instrument further, and the technique,
too. But there’s so many technicians on the oboe. I served
on the jury in Munich at one time. There were sixty oboe players
there, and every one of them had fabulous fingers. Every one of them
was able to finger the passage, so you have to come to the conclusion that
the fingering part of the oboe is by far the easiest part, because so many
people can do it well.
BD: You get that down, and that’s the
beginning? From there you take off?
Still: Yes, but you keep improving.
You keep practicing your fingering technique. Some people are
obsessed with it, and they go through all these études books.
They think the more complicated études they play, the better
they’re going to get, not realizing what the really difficult thing is
to do on the instrument. If I would write a resumé on these
people, I’d say “Fantastic fingers!” That would be my first comment,
and then I’d say, “Tone very boring, spread, dull. Intonation very
inaccurate.” They would always start out with fantastic fingers,
and after a while, I’d start writing “Fantastic fingers... so what?”
Everybody had fantastic fingers. If the fingers were everything,
you could teach a very dexterous stenographer to play Daphnis and
Chloé on the oboe in about six months.
BD: It’s also got to be musicianship?
Still: As Hans Hotter said, it’s first the
breath, and after that comes nothing for a long time. Then comes
the embouchure. Next after that in importance comes the tongue,
and after that come the fingers.
BD: We haven’t talked at all about baroque and
other early instruments. What are your thoughts on these?
Still: For a long time I didn’t like the
sound they were getting on recordings of baroque instruments, but recently
I’ve heard a lot of players who do very, very well. Some of the
players from a group in Cologne, for instance, do very well, as do The
London Consort with Trevor Pinnock. They had one fellow who was
an American, who died recently, and now there’s Richard Goodwin who plays
very well. They play in tune, and there’s something about the sound
of a baroque instrument for certain kinds of music which is better than
certain kinds of modern instruments, especially where you get the hard
thin tone on the modern instrument.
BD: Have you ever played the older instruments
yourself?
Still: No, I haven’t. We have a player
in the orchestra, Grover Schiltz, the English Horn player, who likes
to play around with them. He also plays the classical oboe, and so
forth.
BD: He had a little solo for oboe d’amore
not too long ago. It was just part of the instrumentation that
called for it.
Still: Yes. When I was playing, usually
the one who played the oboe d’amore was Michael Henoch, who is the Assistant
Principal. He would play the oboe d’amore when it was called for
in a Debussy piece, for instance, or in the Ravel’s Bolero. In
the Domestic Symphony of Strauss he would stick to the English
horn, but now that they have only have a three-men section, I’m not sure
who does which.
BD: Grover played it a couple of weeks ago.
They’ve had to shuffle a little bit, and Grover has even played
Principal a couple of times. They’re trying to uphold the section
while you’re not there. They’re trying to find someone to fill
your shoes, and those will be very difficult shoes to fill!
Still: Thank you very much!
BD: Thank you for being such a fine musician,
and giving your talent to the Chicago Symphony for forty years.
Still: Thank you! I enjoy listening
to your station. I listen to it all the time.
© 1994 Bruce Duffie
This conversation was recorded at the home of Ray Still in suburban
Chicago on May 6, 1994. Portions were broadcast on WNIB the following
year, and again in
2000. This transcription was made in
2022, and posted on this website at that time.
My thanks to British soprano
Una Barry for
her help in preparing this website presentation.
To see a full list (with links) of interviews which have been transcribed
and posted on this
website, click here.
To read my thoughts on editing these interviews for print, as
well as a few other interesting observations, click here.
* * * *
*
Award -
winning broadcaster
Bruce Duffie was with WNIB, Classical
97 in Chicago from 1975 until
its final moment as a classical station in
February of 2001. His interviews have also appeared
in various magazines and journals since 1980, and
he now continues his broadcast series on WNUR-FM, as
well as on Contemporary
Classical Internet Radio.
You are invited to
visit his website for
more information about his work, including
selected transcripts of other interviews, plus
a full list
of his guests. He would also like to call your attention
to the photos and information about his grandfather,
who was a pioneer in the automotive field more than a century ago.
You may also send him E-Mail with comments,
questions and suggestions.
